A machine capability review should compare the intended parts and production requirements with the condition, configuration, accuracy, tooling, facility, and support evidence available.
Which Parts Set the Requirement?
Use representative drawings, materials, tolerances, finishes, envelopes, operations, and expected demand. A general label such as “five-axis capable” does not establish fit for the work.
Which Evidence Is Available?
Review maintenance history, alarms, calibration or test records, configuration, options, hours, service access, and an appropriate inspection or trial where permitted.
What Decision Will Follow?
Define whether the review supports repair, retrofit, purchase, deferral, alternate routing, or outsourcing. Each decision needs different evidence and assumptions.
Build an Evidence Matrix
List each critical requirement down one side—envelope, material, tolerance, finish, operation, volume, automation, facility, service, and safety needs. Across the top, list the evidence available from specifications, records, observation, inspection, and a permitted trial. Mark assumptions and missing evidence visibly.
The matrix does not declare a machine capable by itself. It makes clear which requirements are supported, which need testing, and which risks must be accepted or resolved before the decision.