Reduce Unplanned Machine Downtime

Published by The Streamline Group

Reduce downtime by recording the failure mode, duration, operating condition, response, and recurrence—not by relying on a universal capacity-loss percentage.

Replace “Machine Down” With an Event Record

“Machine down” describes the effect, not the cause. Capture the alarm, component, symptom, job, material, tool, shift, operating condition, and action taken when those details are available.

The first useful distinction is whether the machine could not run, should not run, or had no ready work. Those conditions point to different owners and responses.

Frequent Short Stops

Group events by observable failure mode and total their effect. A repeated interruption can deserve attention even when each occurrence is brief.

Rare High-Impact Failures

Review safety, quality risk, repair lead time, spare availability, and whether the affected asset controls customer completion.

Match the Response to the Evidence

Inspect

Confirm the physical condition and operating context.

Contain

Protect people, product, and the next production decision.

Correct

Select maintenance, training, repair, or redesign based on the mode.

Verify

Check whether recurrence and production impact actually changed.

Questions About This Topic

No universal figure applies. Use the reliability and production requirements of the asset and your own baseline.

No. Criticality, failure modes, duty, environment, support, and consequences differ.

Turn Repeat Stops Into a Reviewable Pattern

Share the asset, recurring symptom, production effect, and any event history already available.

Discuss the Downtime Pattern